Home » Book Reviews » Review: Semantic Structure of Written Communication by Beekman et al.

Review: Semantic Structure of Written Communication by Beekman et al.

Beekman, John, John Callow, and Michael Kopesec. The Semantic Structure of Written Communication. 5th rev. Dallas, TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics, 1981. 147 pp.

The “assumption underlying this work is that meaning is also structured, and that this structure is amenable to linguistic analysis and theory.  Indeed, the purpose of this presentation is to set forth a theory of the structure of meaning—to give it a technical title, semantic structure” (14).  The semantic structure that the authors lay out is hierarchical.  The smallest unit of meaning is a concept, which is a linguistic feature that signifies one single idea.  Multiple concepts make up propositions, which make up propositional clusters, which make up paragraphs, and so forth.

The authors argue that language has natural prominence built in.  There is always a prominent idea within a piece of communication.  This prominence may be natural (e.g., a purpose is more prominent than the means by which the purpose is achieved), or it may be marked by special linguistic features.  An analysis of the semantic structure of a discourse entails finding the discourse constituents (concepts, paragraphs, etc.), finding the semantic relation between each of them, and discovering the most prominent semantic element through this analysis.  The theory is therefore specially helpful for biblical exegesis.

The authors discuss other features of discourse analysis throughout, such as coherence and unity.  Such features are discussed more in detail in the work of Brown and YuleHowever, the authors throughout the work simply assert their theory rather than discussing other work in the field.  This is probably because the work is meant to be a manual for Bible translators, which they desire to be simple and easily teachable.  Thus, the discourse analysis student will want to be sure to supplement this work with others, especially works that deal with pragmatics and marked discourse features.

Reviewed by: Todd Scacewater


1 Comment

  1. […] this is why they have no developed method.  Yet, this volume works as an excellent supplement to Beekman, Callow, and Kopesec’s work.  One can use the semantic analysis method found in their work, while supplementing the semantic […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: